Ku Klux Klan Essays (251 words) - , Term Papers

Ku Klux Klan Ku Klux Klan Prejudice comes in many forms. Two such forms of extreme prejudice are the Salem witch-hunts and the Ku Klux Klan. In the colonial time, from 1700 to 1775, the Salem witch-hunts took place. The KKK originated after the civil war and is still going on today. These two groups based their prejudice on religious beliefs. People from many different cultures founded our nation, which gives us a unique diversity that was and is not always respected. The Ku Klux Klan states they are based on Christianity and uses such symbols as the flaming cross. Burning the cross is supposed to represent opposition to tyranny and obedience to God. The KKK believes they are superior to all non-whites. The people responsible for the Salem witch-hunts feared and persecuted those whom didnt share religious and personal beliefs. A way of testing your beliefs was being forced to recite the 10 commandments without falter. Ku Klux Klan often expressed their beliefs by putting burning crosses in non-white homes, s etting homes and businesses on fire, and even hanging non-whites. In the same way, the witch-hunts would force those who were prosecuted to confess and incriminate, if not, they would be hung, burned, or in one case smashed to death. Both groups use Christianity against other people that differed from them. The KKK was an underground organization, and used robes and hoods to disguise themselves. Rarely did members become publicly known because they were denounced ...

Arsenic and Old Lace essays

Arsenic and Old Lace essays When people in town see Martha and Abby Brewster, they only see half of what is truly there. The people of Brooklyn, New York see two elderly sisters who give to charity and do good all around town. Little do these people know that these ladies are sinister sisters, they poison travelers and have their nephew, Teddy, bury them in the basement. The two women have two other nephews, Mortimer and Jonathon, one is engaged and the other is the black sheep of the family. Lots of laughs were thrown into this twisted play that some how keep the sisters lovable. Early in the play the sisters are chatting with the minister of their church about the war. Abby says at one point, It may not be very charitable of me, but Ive almost come to the conclusion that this Mr. Hitler isnt a Christian. (462) Now people may wonder how such sweet old ladies may turn to murder. The twist in the plot is that they do not see it as murder at all and do not hide the fact that they kill people and bury them in the basement. They see their act of murder as an act of charity. Their victims are always old Christian men who have no family and no friends. Weary travelers seek refuge at their house and never leave after one sip of the elderberry wine the twisted sisters mix up themselves. So exactly how do these sisters manage to do these horrible murders? It is simple really, their father was a doctor and had various medicines and powders stored in his laboratory and they borrowed a few of them. At this point in their lives both women are in their late sixties and their father has passed on so they have free access to the lab and its materials. Martha explained the recipe for the poisoned wine as this, Well, dear, for a gallon of elderberry wine I take one teaspoonful of arsenic, then add a half teaspoon of strychnine and then just a pinch of cyanide. (473) After the men were dead their nephew, Teddy who thought he was President ...

Case Study Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 16

Case Study - Essay Example (2) To elaborate further, the antitrust departments grant approval for huge transactions of mergers and acquisitions involving major players only after ensuring that they are not detrimental to healthy market competition. The laws also combat the aspect of price fixing, which refers to an illegal deal amongst various players for fixing high prices, much against the interests of consumers. (3) In this particular antitrust case related to Microsoft, the ruling of the law court is indeed very much justifiable. Undoubtedly, Microsoft acted against the provisions of antitrust laws, when it started to distribute its Internet Browser at no cost. It also needs to be accepted that, then, Microsoft was propelled by the primary objective of eliminating competition from Netscape. (4) At this juncture, the biggest question that arises is, â€Å"When Microsoft indulged in practices prohibited by the law, how could the court give a ruling that consumers benefitted by the actions of the company?† As has been noted earlier in this analysis, the onus of examining the cases from the perspective of the concerned laws rests on the law courts. In this particular case, notwithstanding the initial actions of Microsoft, the end result actually turned out to be highly beneficial for the consumers. Owing to the Internet browser of Microsoft provided at no cost, consumers were enabled to develop a thorough understanding of Internet operations, and that too when the technology was in its initial stages. This has led to an extensive usage of Internet, encompassing diverse realms of activity. Because of this initiative taken by Microsoft, many other players of the market such as Netscape also started supplying Internet browsers of topmost quality at reasonable prices. (4) In due course of time, all these market developments led to the scenario of Internet revolutionizing the sphere